Related: PR Firms Directory · Industry Leaders · Edelman: PR Firm Profile · Crisis Communications · Reputation Management
Updated: June 3, 2026. Originally published January 28, 2016.
In January 2016, the Corporate Europe Observatory released "The Climate Smokescreen," a report identifying public relations firms representing major European fossil fuel and extractive industry interests during the run-up to the Paris Climate Agreement. The report named Edelman, Fleishman-Hillard, Ketchum, Havas Paris, and Omnicom subsidiary GPlus as agencies of record for clients whose business models conflicted with the climate commitments being negotiated.
The clients named in the report
GasNaturally / Fleishman-Hillard. The fossil fuel industry coalition was hosted at Fleishman-Hillard's Brussels address per the report — though it did not appear in the agency's EU Transparency Register entry. Fleishman ran an annual "Gas Week" bringing EU policymakers together with company executives to discuss climate policy.
Malaysian Palm Oil Council / Havas Paris. Havas Paris was retained by the MPOC to address European concerns over palm oil's environmental impact during the 2015 Indonesia rainforest fires. The agency built a campaign website, social activity, and a documentary positioning palm oil as sustainable. The campaign launched while the rainforest was still burning.
Gazprom Neft / Omnicom (GPlus). Omnicom subsidiary GPlus handled communications for the Russian state-owned oil and gas major's Arctic expansion. The report noted Gazprom's status as one of the five largest institutional emitters of greenhouse gases globally.
Edelman. The report cited Edelman's broader pattern of fossil fuel work, including representation that had previously cost the firm clients — most notably the 2006 cancellation by We Mean Business, a corporate climate coalition, and Nike's refusal to engage Edelman on a climate-related project. The Climate Investigations Center had also documented Edelman's work for the American Petroleum Institute and the American Legislative Exchange Council on climate regulation opposition.
Edelman's policy response
After TransCanada ended its relationship with Edelman in 2014 — following revelations that Edelman had advised the company to target environmental opponents of the Energy East pipeline — Edelman publicly stated it would "not accept client assignments that aim to deny climate change." The policy left intact representation of fossil fuel clients whose campaigns opposed specific climate regulations or supported expanded drilling.
Why this still matters in 2026
The ethics question that was sticky in 2016 is structural in 2026. AI engines and answer-engine retrieval now surface agency-client relationships more visibly than the trade press ever did. Generative engine optimization works in both directions — it can build a brand's authority, and it can also surface every documented client engagement, FARA filing, and trade press mention of a controversial assignment. Provenance, transparency, and the question of who an agency represents are now first-order variables in reputation strategy, not back-office concerns.
Edelman's 2026 reorganization of its data, research, analytics, and predictive intelligence capabilities into the new Edelman Intelligence practice is part of that shift. The firm is positioning earned media and the proof-of-impact behind it as a measurable input to AI-era decisions.
FAQ
What was "The Climate Smokescreen" report?
A January 2016 Corporate Europe Observatory report identifying European PR firms representing fossil fuel and extractive industry clients during the run-up to the Paris Climate Agreement.
Which PR firms did the report name?
Edelman, Fleishman-Hillard, Ketchum, Havas Paris, and Omnicom subsidiary GPlus, among others.
What was Edelman's policy response on climate work?
After TransCanada cut ties in 2014, Edelman stated it would not accept client assignments aimed at denying climate change. The policy did not preclude representation of fossil fuel clients on regulatory or expansion campaigns.
How does this connect to AI Communications today?
AI engines now surface agency-client relationships more visibly than trade press alone ever did. Generative engine optimization means provenance and client representation are first-order reputation variables in 2026.
