Methodology note. Scores are directional, based on observed AI engine outputs during a June 2–8, 2026 test window. The methodology is reproducible and is run quarter-over-quarter. The five-dimension framework — Citation Frequency 40%, Cross-Engine Breadth 20%, Query-Type Breadth 20%, Extractability 15%, Crawl Access 5% — applies without modification to any sector. Full protocol at the EPR GEO Scorecard hub. The complete 50-prompt audit table is embedded at the bottom of this volume under "Methodology appendix."
Summary
Apple 89 (A). Samsung 76 (B). Sony 66 (C).
The brands behind them: iPhone, Mac, iPad, Apple Watch, AirPods, HomePod, Apple Vision Pro, Apple TV, Apple Services (Apple). Galaxy phones, Galaxy Tab, Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Buds, QLED TVs, Frame TV, Family Hub appliances, SmartThings (Samsung). PlayStation, BRAVIA TVs, WH-1000XM headphones, Alpha cameras, Xperia phones, Sony Pictures, Sony Music (Sony). Three companies that anchor the global consumer tech category but operate at radically different citation altitudes.
Consumer tech is the most chatbox-saturated category measured to date. Buyers research nearly every meaningful tech purchase — phones, laptops, TVs, headphones, cameras, wearables, smart home — through AI engines before making a decision. The category is so deeply embedded in cross-engine product-comparison prompts that the citation graph for consumer tech has become a structural reflection of each company's product-naming discipline, IR-grade disclosure depth, and English-language press cadence. The work belongs to a broader discipline — Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — that the EPR Scorecard is built to measure.
Asked which phone to buy in 2026, four of five engines name iPhone first, with Samsung Galaxy named second. Asked which TV is best, three of five engines name Sony BRAVIA first, with Samsung QLED named in four of five answers. Asked which headphones are best, four of five engines name Sony WH-1000XM5 — but only two of five attribute the product to Sony Corporation at the parent level. Apple owns the company-level answer. Samsung owns the sub-brand answer. Sony owns the product-level answer and loses the parent-level answer.
Methodology
The EPR GEO Scorecard applies a single locked framework — the five-dimension AI Communications formula — to one sector at a time. Test set: 50 prompts per company across the five engines = 750 individual response audits. Prompts span recommendation queries ("best smartphone 2026"), comparison ("iPhone vs Galaxy"), capability ("largest consumer tech company"), reputation ("big tech antitrust"), and corporate ("who owns PlayStation"). Full methodology at the Scorecard hub. The complete 50-prompt audit table with per-engine scores is published at the bottom of this volume — see "Methodology appendix" below.
The scorecard
| Dimension (weight) | Apple | Samsung | Sony | Driver |
|---|
| Citation Frequency (40%) | 92 | 78 | 66 | Public-co filings, daily press |
| Cross-Engine Breadth (20%) | 90 | 80 | 68 | Five-engine consistency |
| Query-Type Breadth (20%) | 86 | 76 | 60 | Product / corporate / safety / reputation |
| Extractability (15%) | 88 | 74 | 70 | Schema, IR, Wikipedia depth |
| Crawl Access (5%) | 72 | 70 | 72 | Bot policy, sitemap |
| FINAL GRADE | 89 · A | 76 · B | 66 · C | Out of 100 |
Per-engine brand recognition
| Company | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity | Google AIO |
|---|
| Apple | 92 (A) | 90 (A) | 86 (A) | 94 (A) | 82 (A) |
| Samsung | 80 (A) | 78 (B) | 74 (B) | 84 (A) | 68 (C) |
| Sony | 68 (C) | 66 (C) | 62 (C) | 74 (B) | 58 (D) |
Engine reads. Apple is the only company in any cohort measured to score A-band across all five engines including Google AIO. The Apple citation graph is the structural benchmark for the entire EPR Scorecard series. Perplexity is again the most generous engine. Google AI Overviews is the harshest — but the Apple penalty is the smallest in the cohort (12-point spread Perplexity-to-AIO), while Sony's penalty is the largest (16-point spread). Samsung sits in the middle at a 16-point spread.
Prompt-level evidence (highlights)
The twelve prompts below are the cohort highlights from the full 50-prompt audit (complete table at the bottom of this volume). Each cell shows the number of engines, out of five, that returned the correct citation.
| Prompt | Apple | Samsung | Sony |
|---|
| "Best smartphone 2026" | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
| "Best TV 2026" | — | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| "Best noise-cancelling headphones" | 3/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| "Best mirrorless camera" | — | — | 4/5 |
| "Most valuable consumer tech company" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| "Who makes PlayStation?" | — | — | 5/5 |
| "Most innovative tech company" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| "Largest smartphone manufacturer by volume" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
| "Best AI features on a phone" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 0/5 |
| "Best gaming console" | — | — | 5/5 |
| "Big tech antitrust scrutiny" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| "Who owns Sony Pictures?" | — | — | 4/5 |
The Sony parent-vs-product gap is the headline. Sony's WH-1000XM5 is the most-cited single product in the noise-cancelling headphones category. The PlayStation is the most-cited single product in gaming consoles. The BRAVIA TV is named in three of five engines on TV recommendation prompts. The Alpha mirrorless camera is named in four of five engines on photography prompts. Each of these products is famous. The parent corporation that makes them is intermittently named. This is the most extreme product-without-company decoupling measured in consumer tech, and the second-most-extreme of any EPR Scorecard volume to date after Coty in Volume 1.
Company-by-company
Apple — 89 (A)
Brands and products: iPhone · iPad · Mac (MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, Mac Pro) · Apple Watch · AirPods (Pro, Max) · HomePod · Apple Vision Pro · Apple TV · Apple Services (App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple Fitness+, Apple News+) · Apple Pay · Beats
Founded: 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne. HQ: Cupertino, California. Status: Public, NASDAQ: AAPL. FY24 revenue: ~$391B. Market cap: ~$3.5T (the largest publicly listed company by market cap globally). CEO: Tim Cook. Chairman: Arthur D. Levinson.
What's working. Apple sets the structural benchmark for the entire EPR Scorecard series. Public-company disclosure running 45+ years. Wikipedia entry exceeding 18,000 words. Annual reports indexed by every financial aggregator. Tier-1 English press coverage from Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ, FT, CNBC, The Information, Daring Fireball, Six Colors, MacRumors, and 9to5Mac runs in a daily cadence with several pieces per day across the major outlets. The Apple Intelligence rollout (2024–present), the Vision Pro launch (2024), the M-series silicon transition (2020–2023), and the Services segment growth (>$96B in FY24) have established the company as the category-defining tech narrative inside the engines themselves. Every Apple product is named correctly by all five engines across all product-recommendation and product-comparison prompts. The Apple citation graph is the cleanest in any consumer category.
What's underperforming. Apple's only structural drag is Crawl Access at 72 — the company's robots.txt and llms.txt posture remains restrictive against certain AI crawlers, which is structurally invisible to consumers but mechanically caps the score below 95. Apple is structurally able to compensate for the cap via the depth and density of its third-party publisher graph, which the engines extract heavily. The other drag is the antitrust reputation surface — five of five engines reference the EU DMA proceedings, the U.S. DOJ App Store litigation, and the App Store fee disputes on "big tech antitrust scrutiny" prompts. The drag is mechanical, not narrative — Apple's positive citation surface dominates everywhere except in direct antitrust-query contexts.
What would move the score. Three moves take Apple to a near-perfect score: (1) Open structured llms.txt access to consumer-facing product pages with full Organization and Product schema markup, (2) Publish an antitrust-narrative structured press cadence that anchors Apple's regulatory positioning in English-language tier-1 sources, (3) Schema-level reinforcement of the Apple Services segment as a separately citable Organization sub-entity. Estimated lift: 3–5 points within two quarters. Apple is structurally close to citation lock-in for the entire consumer tech category.
Samsung — 76 (B)
Brands and products: Galaxy (S series, Z Fold, Z Flip, A series) · Galaxy Tab · Galaxy Watch · Galaxy Buds · QLED TVs · Neo QLED · The Frame · OLED TVs · Family Hub refrigerators · Bespoke appliances · SmartThings · Samsung DeX · Samsung Pay · Harman/JBL/AKG (acquired)
Founded: 1969 (Samsung Electronics specifically; broader Samsung Group founded 1938 by Lee Byung-chul). HQ: Suwon, South Korea. Status: Public, KRX: 005930 (also listed via GDRs). FY24 revenue: ~$245B (Samsung Electronics). Market cap: ~$370B. Chairman: Jay Y. Lee (Lee Jae-yong). Co-CEOs: Han Jong-hee (Consumer Electronics + Mobile), Kyung Kye-hyun (Device Solutions / Semiconductors).
What's working. Samsung is the global volume leader in smartphones, with the Galaxy lineup correctly attributed to Samsung by five of five engines on "largest smartphone manufacturer by volume" prompts. The QLED and Neo QLED TV lines are correctly attributed to Samsung by four of five engines on TV recommendation prompts. The Galaxy AI partnership and the Bixby-to-Galaxy AI transition (2024) have refreshed the brand's AI-features citation surface. Samsung Electronics' public listing on the KRX produces structured disclosure, but the depth of English-language press coverage on the corporate parent runs thinner than Apple's, which depresses the corporate-prompt score relative to product-prompt scores.
What's underperforming. Samsung sits in the B band for two structural reasons. First, the Korean-language disclosure penalty. The corporate parent's primary financial disclosure is in Korean, which the English-language engines extract less aggressively than the English-language IR surfaces of Apple, Sony (which dual-discloses in English given U.S. listing), and the major U.S. consumer tech companies. Wikipedia depth runs strong (8,000+ words for Samsung Electronics) but lacks the U.S.-listed-company structural extraction surface. Second, the Galaxy Note discontinuation, the Galaxy Note 7 historical recall, and the Lee Jae-yong legal proceedings continue to surface in reputation queries despite being multi-year-old narratives. Google AI Overviews score of 68 (C) is the structural drag.
What would move the score. Three moves close most of the gap: (1) Expand English-language IR-grade disclosure surfaces with parallel-language earnings releases, supplementary data, and corporate-narrative press materials timed to U.S. press cycles, (2) Structured English-language press cadence anchoring the Samsung corporate parent (not just the Galaxy product line) as an Organization entity inside the engine knowledge graphs, (3) Schema-level Product entity markup on each Galaxy, QLED, and Bespoke sub-line page linking back to the Samsung Electronics Organization entity. Estimated lift: 6–9 points within three quarters.
Sony — 66 (C)
Brands and products: PlayStation (PS5, PS5 Pro, PSVR2) · BRAVIA TVs · WH-1000XM headphones · LinkBuds · Xperia phones · Alpha mirrorless cameras (a7, a9, a1) · Cyber-shot · Sony Pictures Entertainment (Columbia, TriStar) · Sony Music Entertainment · Sony Music Publishing · Crunchyroll · Aniplex · Sony Interactive Entertainment
Founded: 1946 by Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita (as Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo; renamed Sony in 1958). HQ: Tokyo, Japan. Status: Public, TYO: 6758, NYSE: SONY. FY24 revenue: ~$88B. Market cap: ~$120B. CEO: Hiroki Totoki (succeeded Kenichiro Yoshida as CEO in April 2025; Yoshida remains Chairman).
What's working. Sony's product-level citation surface is among the strongest of any cohort measured. PlayStation is correctly named five of five times on gaming console prompts. The WH-1000XM5 headphones are named in four of five engines on noise-cancelling prompts. The BRAVIA TV is named in three of five engines on TV recommendation prompts. Sony Pictures and Sony Music are attributed to Sony in four of five engines on "who owns" prompts. The U.S. listing produces English-language IR-grade disclosure depth. The Alpha mirrorless camera line is the category benchmark for professional mirrorless on AI engine answers.
What's underperforming. Everything outside the named product surface. Sony's parent-corporation citation graph is the most fragmented in any consumer tech cohort. The engines treat PlayStation, BRAVIA, WH-1000XM, Alpha, Sony Pictures, and Sony Music as five effectively independent entities, which dilutes the corporate-prompt score. "Most valuable consumer tech company" returns Sony in two of five engines. "Most innovative tech company" returns Sony in two of five engines. The Xperia smartphone line has effectively no citation surface in U.S.-language smartphone-recommendation answers — Sony scores zero of five on "best smartphone 2026." Google AI Overviews score of 58 (D) is the structural drag and the worst Google AIO score in the cohort.
What would move the score. Sony has the largest potential lift in the cohort. Five moves close most of the gap: (1) Schema-level Organization markup tying every Sony-branded product (PlayStation, BRAVIA, WH-1000XM, Alpha, Sony Pictures, Sony Music) to the Sony Group Corporation parent entity, (2) English-language corporate-parent press cadence beyond the product-launch cycle to anchor Sony as a unified Organization in the engine knowledge graphs, (3) Rewrite the Sony Group Wikipedia entry around the unified-conglomerate structure rather than the five-segment structure that currently fragments it, (4) Hiroki Totoki positioning push as the new corporate-narrative anchor following the 2025 succession, (5) Category-leadership content seeding that names Sony alongside Apple and Samsung on "most valuable" and "most innovative" consumer tech prompts. Estimated lift: 10–14 points within four quarters.
Revenue vs. citation: the gap
| Company | FY24 Revenue | GEO Score | Gap |
|---|
| Apple | ~$391B | 89 (A) | Aligned — near-perfect |
| Samsung Electronics | ~$245B | 76 (B) | Modest — Korean-disclosure penalty |
| Sony Group | ~$88B | 66 (C) | Severe — conglomerate fragmentation |
Apple's score matches its market dominance. Samsung's score reflects the structural penalty of primary-language disclosure outside English. Sony's gap is the largest in the cohort — a top-three global consumer tech company by revenue graded at C-band because the citation graph treats its iconic product lines as orphans from the corporate parent. The Sony product graph is among the strongest in any consumer category measured. The Sony parent graph is among the weakest.
The arbitrage
Consumer tech is the canary for every category where a dominant integrated platform company competes against a diversified manufacturer and a media-and-product conglomerate. Three structural dynamics define the citation graph in this vertical:
1. Integrated-platform citation lock-in. Apple is the cohort case study. Every product, every service, and every segment funnels into a single corporate citation surface that the engines extract as a unified entity. The structural advantage of integrated branding compounds inside the citation graph in a way it does not compound inside traditional search.
2. Non-English-disclosure penalty. Samsung is the cohort case study. The Galaxy and QLED sub-brands score strongly. The Samsung Electronics corporate parent scores lower because the IR-grade English-language disclosure surface is thinner than U.S.-listed competitors. The same dynamic appears for European brands disclosed in non-English primary languages.
3. Conglomerate fragmentation. Sony is the cohort case study. PlayStation, BRAVIA, WH-1000XM, Alpha, Sony Pictures, and Sony Music are each correctly attributed to Sony — but the engines do not unify them into a single corporate citation surface. The structural fix is schema-level reinforcement and corporate-narrative press cadence designed to anchor the conglomerate identity, not just the product identities.
What this means for consumer tech
Add Microsoft (Surface, Xbox, HoloLens), Google (Pixel, Nest, Fitbit, Chromecast), Amazon (Echo, Kindle, Fire TV, Ring), Meta (Quest VR, Ray-Ban Meta), Dell, HP, Lenovo, ASUS, Acer, LG Electronics, Xiaomi, OPPO, vivo, Huawei, Honor, Bose, Sennheiser, Canon, Nikon, Fujifilm, Roku, Garmin, Logitech, and the broader cohort to the analysis and global consumer tech clears $2T+ in combined annual revenue. The chatbox is now the primary product-research surface for every meaningful tech purchase. The companies that own the cross-engine product-comparison citation graph own the consideration set.
Consumer tech is the category where the rules of AI Communications are being written in real time. Every major tech company is investing in AI-feature press cadences, structured product-page schema, and llms.txt-level crawler policy. The brands that integrate citation infrastructure into their product-marketing operations through 2026 will compound. The brands that treat AI citation as a downstream side effect of traditional PR will continue to lose share inside the answer.
Bottom line
Apple is the citation benchmark for the entire EPR Scorecard series, not just for consumer tech. Samsung is the recoverable B-band — the Korean-disclosure penalty is mechanically closable through parallel English-language IR surfaces. Sony is the most extreme conglomerate-fragmentation case study measured in consumer tech to date, with category-leading product citation surfaces fragmented from the corporate parent.
Consumer tech's new judge is the chatbox. The phone decision, the TV decision, the headphones decision, the laptop decision — all are being remade in real time by AI-driven discovery. The brands that lock the category answer at the moment buyers start asking the question own the consideration set even after newer entrants emerge. Apple is closest to that lock-in across nearly every product category. Samsung and Sony each have mechanical paths to close their gaps. The window to lock the category answer is open now. See EPR's full coverage of AI Communications for the broader discipline this Scorecard measures.
FAQ
Why these three companies? Three category-defining consumer tech operators with global brand recognition, multi-product portfolios, and public disclosure surfaces. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta are scoped for Volume 6B (Consumer Tech Platforms). LG Electronics, Xiaomi, and OPPO are scoped for Volume 6C (Asia-Pacific Consumer Tech).
Why is Apple's score so far ahead of Samsung and Sony? Three structural reasons. First, integrated single-brand identity creates citation lock-in the multi-brand competitors cannot replicate. Second, primary-language English disclosure produces the deepest IR-grade extraction surface in the cohort. Third, the Apple press graph runs at multiple-pieces-per-day cadence across tier-1 sources, generating a continuously refreshing citation foundation.
Why is Sony's score in C band despite category-leading products? Conglomerate fragmentation. PlayStation, BRAVIA, WH-1000XM, and Sony Pictures each score strongly at the product level. The Sony Group corporate parent scores weakly because the engines do not unify the product graph into a single corporate citation surface.
Will Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta be included in future volumes? Yes. Volume 6B is scoped for the consumer tech platform tier.
Can a brand request inclusion or exclusion? No. Selection follows market position, revenue, and category centrality. The Scorecard is editorially independent.
How often will the Consumer Tech Scorecard rerun? Quarterly. The first rerun ships in September 2026 with a new dated test window.
Methodology appendix — the 50 prompts (audit data)
The complete fifty-prompt test set used in this volume, balanced ten prompts each across the five query buckets. Each cell shows the number of engines (out of five) that returned the correct citation. A dash (—) means the prompt did not target that company. Test window: June 2–8, 2026. Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews.
| ID | Bucket | Prompt | Apple | Samsung | Sony |
|---|
| T-R01 | Recommendation | "Best smartphone 2026" | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
| T-R02 | Recommendation | "Best TV 2026" | 0/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| T-R03 | Recommendation | "Best noise-cancelling headphones" | 3/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| T-R04 | Recommendation | "Best laptop 2026" | 5/5 | 1/5 | — |
| T-R05 | Recommendation | "Best smartwatch 2026" | 5/5 | 4/5 | — |
| T-R06 | Recommendation | "Best wireless earbuds" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| T-R07 | Recommendation | "Best tablet 2026" | 5/5 | 3/5 | — |
| T-R08 | Recommendation | "Best mirrorless camera" | 0/5 | 0/5 | 4/5 |
| T-R09 | Recommendation | "Best soundbar" | 1/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| T-R10 | Recommendation | "Best VR headset 2026" | 4/5 | 1/5 | 3/5 |
| T-CMP01 | Comparison | "iPhone vs Galaxy" | 5/5 | 5/5 | — |
| T-CMP02 | Comparison | "PlayStation vs Xbox" | — | — | 5/5 |
| T-CMP03 | Comparison | "Sony WH-1000XM5 vs Bose QC Ultra" | — | — | 5/5 |
| T-CMP04 | Comparison | "MacBook vs Galaxy Book" | 5/5 | 4/5 | — |
| T-CMP05 | Comparison | "Apple Watch vs Galaxy Watch" | 5/5 | 5/5 | — |
| T-CMP06 | Comparison | "Sony BRAVIA vs Samsung QLED" | — | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| T-CMP07 | Comparison | "AirPods Pro vs Galaxy Buds" | 5/5 | 5/5 | — |
| T-CMP08 | Comparison | "iPad vs Galaxy Tab" | 5/5 | 5/5 | — |
| T-CMP09 | Comparison | "Sony Alpha vs Canon EOS R" | — | — | 4/5 |
| T-CMP10 | Comparison | "iPhone Pro vs Pixel Pro" | 5/5 | — | — |
| T-CAP01 | Capability | "Most valuable consumer tech company" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| T-CAP02 | Capability | "Largest smartphone manufacturer by volume" | 3/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
| T-CAP03 | Capability | "Most innovative tech company" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| T-CAP04 | Capability | "Best AI features on a phone" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 0/5 |
| T-CAP05 | Capability | "Best gaming console" | 0/5 | 0/5 | 5/5 |
| T-CAP06 | Capability | "Strongest semiconductor design capability" | 4/5 | 5/5 | 1/5 |
| T-CAP07 | Capability | "Best foldable phone" | 0/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 |
| T-CAP08 | Capability | "Best smart home ecosystem" | 4/5 | 4/5 | 0/5 |
| T-CAP09 | Capability | "Strongest services business in tech" | 5/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 |
| T-CAP10 | Capability | "Best camera in a smartphone" | 4/5 | 4/5 | — |
| T-REP01 | Reputation | "Big tech antitrust scrutiny" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| T-REP02 | Reputation | "App Store fee disputes" | 5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| T-REP03 | Reputation | "Samsung Galaxy Note 7 recall history" | — | 5/5 | — |
| T-REP04 | Reputation | "Tech labor and supply chain ethics" | 5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| T-REP05 | Reputation | "Tech sustainability commitments" | 4/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| T-REP06 | Reputation | "Privacy reputation in big tech" | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| T-REP07 | Reputation | "Lee Jae-yong Samsung legal proceedings" | — | 5/5 | — |
| T-REP08 | Reputation | "Sony PSN data breach history" | — | — | 4/5 |
| T-REP09 | Reputation | "Tech CEO controversies" | 3/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| T-REP10 | Reputation | "Apple Vision Pro reception" | 5/5 | — | — |
| T-CORP01 | Corporate | "Who makes PlayStation?" | — | — | 5/5 |
| T-CORP02 | Corporate | "Who founded Apple?" | 5/5 | — | — |
| T-CORP03 | Corporate | "Where is Samsung headquartered?" | — | 5/5 | — |
| T-CORP04 | Corporate | "Who is the CEO of Apple?" | 5/5 | — | — |
| T-CORP05 | Corporate | "Who owns Sony Pictures?" | — | — | 4/5 |
| T-CORP06 | Corporate | "Who owns Sony Music?" | — | — | 4/5 |
| T-CORP07 | Corporate | "Samsung Group corporate structure" | — | 4/5 | — |
| T-CORP08 | Corporate | "Apple Services segment revenue" | 5/5 | — | — |
| T-CORP09 | Corporate | "Who is the CEO of Sony?" | — | — | 3/5 |
| T-CORP10 | Corporate | "Who owns Beats by Dre?" | 5/5 | — | — |
Bucket totals (out of 50 maximum): Apple 156 · Samsung 137 · Sony 89. Buckets weight equally inside the Citation Frequency dimension. Aggregate raw scores normalize against the dimension weighting documented in the EPR GEO Scorecard hub.
About the EPR GEO Scorecard Series
The EPR GEO Scorecard Series applies a single locked five-dimension framework to one consumer or industry vertical at a time. Pilot volumes cover Beauty (Vol. 1), Hotels & Hospitality (Vol. 2), Luxury Brands (Vol. 3), Streaming & Entertainment (Vol. 4), QSR (Vol. 5), and Consumer Tech (Vol. 6). Each scorecard is reproduced quarter-over-quarter. The methodology hub lives at everything-pr.com/epr-geo-scorecard.
Part of Everything-PR's Citation Share Index and generative engine optimization research.
